Compliance progress your executives can read in one sitting.
GRC Policy Engine turns existing policies, targeted answers, and framework requirements into mapped policy drafts, scorecards, and auditor-ready review trails without weeks of spreadsheet churn.
Executive scorecard
Current policy posture
Overall
71%
90
Controls mapped
22
Fully covered
68
Partial coverage
Estimated lift avoided
42 hrs
Manual mapping and policy drafting
Next action
Close access-control evidence
Add SSO/MFA proof or answer targeted questions.
5
Frameworks supported now
3
Policy output styles
1
Shared auditor review trail
Pilot
Free trial access by invitation
Workflow
A compliance process that starts with what you already have.
The product is built around a simple principle: preserve the useful work already sitting in your policy folder, then fill the gaps with traceable framework language.
01
Upload what already exists
Start with current policies, procedures, screenshots, and evidence. The system keeps a record of which documents supported each assessment.
02
Map coverage to frameworks
AI-assisted analysis identifies full coverage, partial coverage, and remaining evidence needs across the selected control sets.
03
Generate review-ready outputs
Create clean policies, mapped policy versions, merge reviews, executive scorecards, and auditor links without manually building another workbook.
What it gives you
Policy work, evidence mapping, and audit review in one loop.
The goal is not to replace judgment. It is to reduce the rote work around policy drafting, gap tracking, framework mapping, and weekly status reporting.
AI-guided assessment conversation
An expert GRC AI walks users through compliance gaps domain by domain, asking targeted questions based on the selected frameworks, organization profile, and uploaded documents.
Automatic document gap analysis
Upload existing policies in PDF, Word, or text format. The system extracts content, maps clauses to framework controls, and flags what is missing or only partially covered.
Multi-framework crosswalk
Create one policy set that can satisfy overlapping ISO 27001, SOC 2, HITRUST, HIPAA, and NIST CSF expectations, mapped at the policy-statement level.
Auditor portal with structured feedback
Mint a read-only review link so external auditors can inspect policies, mapped comments, scorecards, and evidence without needing a full user license.
Prioritized gap remediation
Every gap can carry practical context: what is missing, what evidence would help, how important it is for the assessment, and whether it has been resolved.
Bring your own AI provider
Use a platform key during a pilot or configure an organization-specific provider key for teams that already have AI procurement and security approvals.
For auditors and reviewers
Make review easier without handing over the whole system.
Share selected policies, mappings, and review links so auditors can comment on the material that matters. Internally, keep the change trail connected to the policy lifecycle.
Auditor portal
Information Security Policy
Mapped controls
HITRUST 00.a · ISO A.5 · SOC CC1
Reviewer comments
3 open · 8 resolved
Source language
Uploaded policy + generated gap language
Use cases
The moments this is built for.
These illustrative pilot scenarios are based on common GRC workflows and buying triggers. They are examples, not customer testimonials.
Illustrative pilot scenario
The first enterprise deal is asking for SOC 2
Founder / CTO at a growing SaaS company
Situation
A customer security questionnaire turns into a board-level push for SOC 2 readiness, but the team has no dedicated compliance headcount.
How GRC Policy Engine helps
Upload the docs they already have, identify policy gaps, generate a mapped policy set, and give leadership a scorecard instead of a vague readiness guess.
Weeks of policy drafting compressed into a guided workflow
Illustrative pilot scenario
Healthcare team needs HIPAA and HITRUST language to line up
Compliance lead in a healthcare technology org
Situation
Policies exist, but they were written at different times by different owners and do not cleanly map to HITRUST or HIPAA expectations.
How GRC Policy Engine helps
Compare existing policy language against selected controls, generate gap-fill language, and preserve audit traceability section by section.
Less duplicate work across overlapping healthcare frameworks
Illustrative pilot scenario
Auditor comments need to become controlled policy changes
Security leader managing audit remediation
Situation
Auditor feedback arrives in email, spreadsheets, and meeting notes, then someone has to manually merge it into Word documents.
How GRC Policy Engine helps
Capture auditor feedback in the portal, convert suggested language into change requests, approve it, and commit it back into the policy repository.
A cleaner audit trail from comment to committed policy version
Trust & security
Built for compliance, and honest about maturity.
We are building for security-conscious teams, and we are careful about the difference between controls we operate today and certifications we have not yet completed. No fake badges, no vague trust theater.
In place today
- Tenant isolation via Postgres Row-Level Security on every table
- Encryption at rest through Supabase / AWS and in transit with TLS
- Per-organization scoping for documents, policies, gaps, evidence, and support history
- Bring-your-own AI provider key support for organizations that do not want to use the platform key
- Customer content is not used to train shared AI models
- Short-lived signed URLs for downloads instead of public storage links
- Token-scoped, revocable read-only links for external auditors
- Hosted on Vercel and Supabase infrastructure with their published security programs
On the roadmap
- Formal vendor security packet and customer-facing trust center
- Independent security review as adoption grows
- Per-tenant isolated storage buckets where customer requirements justify it
- Customer-managed encryption keys for storage
- SSO / SAML for enterprise SSO with Okta, Entra, and Google Workspace
- MFA enforcement and per-organization session policies
- Comprehensive audit logging for who viewed or changed what, and when
- Data residency choices for US and EU regions
A note on transparency
We are a young product. Some roadmap items are non-negotiable for security-conscious enterprise customers; others are differentiators we will prioritize as the platform matures. We do not currently claim our own SOC 2 or ISO certification. We would rather show you exactly where we are than overstate it. If you have specific requirements before signing, tell us and we will prioritize against real customer commitments.
Pricing
Start with a free pilot, then choose the model that matches how you actually use it.
Some teams need a one-time policy set. Others want a living repository, change control, and recurring executive reporting. The pricing model is intentionally flexible while pilots are active.
Policy Pack
From $1,800
one-time
For teams that need a framework-mapped policy set, full exports, and a short project window.
- 30-60 day workspace
- One framework included
- Upload existing policies
- AI-guided gap assessment
- Full clean and mapped .docx exports
- Upgrade credit if you continue
Living Repository
From $499
per month
For teams that want GRC Policy Engine to remain their policy system of truth.
- Active assessments and scorecards
- Policy regeneration and versioning
- Change-control workflow support
- Auditor portal and feedback inbox
- Framework crosswalk support
- BYO AI key option
Partner / Custom
Quoted
custom scope
For partner use cases, co-branding, multiple business units, custom frameworks, or advisory delivery models.
- Partner and advisor workflows
- Co-branding and white-label roadmap
- Custom pilot terms
- Volume pricing
- Unique framework or support scope
- Manual quote and payment-link flow
Prices are starting points for design-partner pilots and may vary by framework scope, usage, document volume, and support level.
Need a custom quote?
Tell us what you are trying to package.
Use this for partner pilots, co-branded deployments, larger document volumes, advisory use, or anything that does not fit neatly into a standard package.
Ready to test it?